Ideology and Racial Differences?

[Lioncourt]

some northern climate tribes also live no different then bushmen like eskimos for example, they live in small igloos and hunt for a living. so its not only if you are dark skinned or tropical

Eskimos don't live in temperate climate.

[MrCuriosity]

and if you read the link it was not only east african empires, there were central south and west african empires as well, its totally ideologically driven to ascribe any civilisation in africa due to a "semitic or hamitic influence" whatever that should mean, again pseudo scientific terms and totally ideologically driven

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_empires

But were these African empires and civilizations that advanced? And you say you don't like black slavery, but do you know it was African kings and tribal chieftains who enslaved the vast majority of black slaves that were sold to European slave traders? What do you make of that?

[Mortimer]

But were these African empires and civilizations that advanced? And you say you don't like black slavery, but do you know it was African kings and tribal chieftains who enslaved the vast majority of black slaves that were sold to European slave traders? What do you make of that?

i dont know how advanced they were but it seems it was not only "stone age mudhuts and naked people" right? that how it seems to me without knowing really much. The african chieftains were guilty too but in the sense like native american chieftains were guilty for selling their own land to whites, and then being killed. They are guilty, but at the end it was whites who made those "diplomacies" and fooled them. Whites fooled people, not only with guns, but also with words or diseases, alochol etc.

[MrCuriosity]

i dont know how advanced they were but it seems it was not only "stone age mudhuts and naked people" right? that how it seems to me without knowing really much. The african chieftains were guilty too but in the sense like native american chieftains were guilty for selling their own land to whites, and then being killed. They are guilty, but at the end it was whites who made those "diplomacies" and fooled them. Whites fooled people, not only with guns, but also with words or diseases, alochol etc.

Those evil whiteys! So black African chiefs were not guilty of enslaving, ill-treating, killing or selling other blacks into slavery. They were victims too because they were black. Wisdom man!

[Mortimer]

Those evil whiteys! So black African chiefs were not guilty of enslaving, ill-treating, killing or selling other blacks into slavery. They were victims too because they were black. Wisdom man!

those few chieftains were guilty but it shouldnt take away from the racial aspect of slavery in americas, like it would seem it had nothing to do with them being negroes, or slavery has nothing to do with white and black, you are similar to smeagol who tries to minimise the racial aspect. but the few chieftains were guilty, and probably drunk and got money for it.

[MrCuriosity]

Mortimer's mentor on politics and thinking right here...

[MrCuriosity]

those few chieftains were guilty but it shouldnt take away from the racial aspect of slavery in americas, like it would seem it had nothing to do with them being negroes, or slavery has nothing to do with white and black, you are similar to smeagol who tries to minimise the racial aspect. but the few chieftains were guilty, and probably drunk and got money for it.

Of course they were made slaves because they were black. Because even the pope and Protestant clergy approved of black slavery for a long time. They thought blacks are not fully human and also thought they could convert them to Christianity and save their souls through slavery. But it wasn't the guilt of only whites and it wasn't just a few chieftains and kings, but a lot of them. Of course they got paid in goods and they may have been drunk at times, but the guilt is there. They routinely warred against other tribes and kingdoms and made slaves of pows. They were not nice people. Part of the reason why slavery was allowed, was not just black skin , but the savagery that was said to rule in black Africa, including cannibal tribes.

[cass]

Political traits can also be genetically predicted. Dnagenics gives you this option.


Certainly, different genes are responsible for appearance, and others for risk-taking, ecological tendencies, equality, acceptability of immigration, etc.

[Lioncourt]

Its racial. Scientific fact that some race are smarter than others and they have more IQ. If its depends on climate then why iraqis are much poorer than finns? Iraq is located in the Fertile Crescent, its much better place for agriculture, economy etc.

There is no such scientific fact lol.

[Blondie]

There is no such scientific fact lol.

Like it or not its scientific fact that blacks have lower IQ. Afro-americans are much worse student than whites, and east asians are the best in the schools. Dont deny the reality