1
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,614 Given: 4,516 |
Much of the Coon material is laughable. I find it interesting that, despite the fact that much of what he posited has been discredited, people still reference the guy.![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,614 Given: 4,516 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,614 Given: 4,516 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 53 Given: 0 |
Well, i think even the Basques are not similar to early Bell Beakers since they probably looked too WestAsian/MENA at early stage.
The closest one to appearance would come the North Mesopotamian/ EastAnatolian Taurids.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,090 Given: 4,184 |
So, like this fellow?The Bell Beaker group is more extreme in many ways; the browridges are often heavy, the general ruggedness frequently greater. The faces are characteristically narrow, the orbits medium to high, the nasal skeleton high and aquiline; the occiput frequently flat. The stature for six males reached the high mean of 177 cm.
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 53 Given: 0 |
Dienekes quoted him.I suppose he is laughable to you too.
Anyway,R1b in Western Europe is because of founder effect/genetic drift they didn't left much of autosomal impact.In WestAsia/Northern Mesopotamia the diversity is higher and the clades are older.So it is obviously that they will resemble more the early Bell Beakers.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 69 Given: 12 |
16% for Albania, for Albanians in general: about 20%. That's not important though, we're discussing phenotype not Y-DNA. If the case was Y-DNA you would have been right, however. And in that case, Albanians are characteristically close to the Bell Beakers in many ways, especially the Cranium is quite similar to that of the Bell Beakers. Probably due to the selection of Dinaroid traits that had perhaps been introduced by the Bell Beakers but which is also favourable for a mountainous area, at least the same evolutionary tendencies.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks