1




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,320/739 Given: 20,298/1,183 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,603/953 Given: 409/684 |
Around 1% is more punctual. The spread of the N between the conquest age Magyars were also not neccesary significant! Some rich burial is not a statistically relevant population sample! Especially, since the noblemes were much more metised between the Magyars! And the Magyar conquerors were a very mixed population from the steppe, look at the I2a guardsmens besides the presumably Sargat origin R1b aristocrats! Who were these guys?
Anyway, proto-Magyars from the Cherkaskul/Mezhovka culture:
YDNA: 50/50% R1a1a1(Z283)/R1b1a2
mtDNA: 33/33/33% I5/J2/M1
source: Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,638/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Slavs! They were dinaric I2a types (one south, one north)
InterestingAnyway, proto-Magyars from the Cherkaskul/Mezhovka culture:
YDNA: 50/50% R1a1a1(Z283)/R1b1a2
mtDNA: 33/33/33% I5/J2/M1
source: Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,638/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,315/907 Given: 71/59 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,320/739 Given: 20,298/1,183 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,320/739 Given: 20,298/1,183 |
There are even Australoids with R1b and with I1:
![]()


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,638/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks